<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Rockonomics Dot Net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rockonomics.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rockonomics.net</link>
	<description>Money - Freedom - Markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:23:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Gold, (instead of anything else)? by Josh S</title>
		<link>http://rockonomics.net/money/why-gold-instead-of-anything-else/#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockonomics.net/?p=773#comment-968</guid>
		<description>Gold has one drawback--it loses value with use.  Paper money can&#039;t be clipped.  Gold can.  Just put a bunch of gold coins in a sack, shake it up, and now you have more money that you started with--the face value of the coins, plus the dust.

The major problem with fiats is most likely their monopoly status in currency zones, not the intrinsic nature of fiat money as such.  One thing you&#039;ll notice is that rapidly-melting currencies end up being rather useless for international trades, so governments that inflate their currencies too fast find themselves unable to procure goods and services in the quantities they want.  As it so happens, trade ends up being conducted in currencies that are relatively stable over the medium term--even third-world despots are forced to trade in dollars and euros.

The inflationary pressure comes from the monopoly privilege governments grant to themselves.  The temptation is ever present to run a perpetual deficit financed with printed money.  They&#039;re able to do this because, while markets may ultimately dictate which currency is used in international trade, the citizens of a country are forced to use the government&#039;s fiat.  This allows every government some leeway to inflate.  If currency markets existed both domestically *and* internationally, i.e., currency was provided by competing private institutions rather than monopolies, the overwhelming market pressure would be for a currency with a stable value (and there&#039;d be no pressure to buy votes via stealth devaluation).  Debtors are hurt by deflation, and lenders are hurt by inflation--so the market demand is for a stable currency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gold has one drawback&#8211;it loses value with use.  Paper money can&#8217;t be clipped.  Gold can.  Just put a bunch of gold coins in a sack, shake it up, and now you have more money that you started with&#8211;the face value of the coins, plus the dust.</p>
<p>The major problem with fiats is most likely their monopoly status in currency zones, not the intrinsic nature of fiat money as such.  One thing you&#8217;ll notice is that rapidly-melting currencies end up being rather useless for international trades, so governments that inflate their currencies too fast find themselves unable to procure goods and services in the quantities they want.  As it so happens, trade ends up being conducted in currencies that are relatively stable over the medium term&#8211;even third-world despots are forced to trade in dollars and euros.</p>
<p>The inflationary pressure comes from the monopoly privilege governments grant to themselves.  The temptation is ever present to run a perpetual deficit financed with printed money.  They&#8217;re able to do this because, while markets may ultimately dictate which currency is used in international trade, the citizens of a country are forced to use the government&#8217;s fiat.  This allows every government some leeway to inflate.  If currency markets existed both domestically *and* internationally, i.e., currency was provided by competing private institutions rather than monopolies, the overwhelming market pressure would be for a currency with a stable value (and there&#8217;d be no pressure to buy votes via stealth devaluation).  Debtors are hurt by deflation, and lenders are hurt by inflation&#8211;so the market demand is for a stable currency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Modest Proposal by Josh S</title>
		<link>http://rockonomics.net/money/a-modest-proposal/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackheald.com/?p=353#comment-826</guid>
		<description>If everyone stopped making payments on their credit cards all at once, there would be a second crisis, and the Fed would step in to make sure all the banks stayed liquid.  It would effectively accomplish nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If everyone stopped making payments on their credit cards all at once, there would be a second crisis, and the Fed would step in to make sure all the banks stayed liquid.  It would effectively accomplish nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Terror and Addiction: Another Name for &#8220;Banking&#8221; by Guy Fawkes</title>
		<link>http://rockonomics.net/money/terror-and-addiction-as-models-for-financial-policy/#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Fawkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockonomics.net/?p=218#comment-783</guid>
		<description>Please DO forward and link and post and whatever. The more the merrier!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please DO forward and link and post and whatever. The more the merrier!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Terror and Addiction: Another Name for &#8220;Banking&#8221; by Carole Makowski</title>
		<link>http://rockonomics.net/money/terror-and-addiction-as-models-for-financial-policy/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>Carole Makowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockonomics.net/?p=218#comment-745</guid>
		<description>Whoa! Very well said. May I forward to peeps and post on my FB page?

Interesting, just because I am not so much into the banking thing, I immediately saw the parallel in relation to the addicts of the liberal victim world view. Your piece is utterly applicable all the way through to how they use our hearts against us and how they react when cut off. In fact, I think the idea of Tough Love is a liberal label, implying love that is hard. Love in and of itself is not tough particularly to the recipient: it is truth, desiring reality for the loved one, willingness to do anything so that the loved one will walk in health, life, freedom. In my mind, there is no such thing as Tough Love, since love is itself. If anything, love is tough for the lover, as one is often asked to employ the long suffering, the patience, the kindness - in the face of wherever the recipient is at the time. Example: The Father, loving us eternally, while we, seemingly eternally, don&#039;t get it. Who&#039;s finding it tougher?  Just sayin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa! Very well said. May I forward to peeps and post on my FB page?</p>
<p>Interesting, just because I am not so much into the banking thing, I immediately saw the parallel in relation to the addicts of the liberal victim world view. Your piece is utterly applicable all the way through to how they use our hearts against us and how they react when cut off. In fact, I think the idea of Tough Love is a liberal label, implying love that is hard. Love in and of itself is not tough particularly to the recipient: it is truth, desiring reality for the loved one, willingness to do anything so that the loved one will walk in health, life, freedom. In my mind, there is no such thing as Tough Love, since love is itself. If anything, love is tough for the lover, as one is often asked to employ the long suffering, the patience, the kindness &#8211; in the face of wherever the recipient is at the time. Example: The Father, loving us eternally, while we, seemingly eternally, don&#8217;t get it. Who&#8217;s finding it tougher?  Just sayin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Banks &#8211; Big Frauds by Guy Fawkes</title>
		<link>http://rockonomics.net/money/big-banks-big-frauds/#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Fawkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockonomics.net/?p=165#comment-643</guid>
		<description>If you believe that, then you are not paying attention. The Big Banks clearly &lt;em&gt;run&lt;/em&gt; the financial portion of the government, to the detriment of everyone else. The Big Banks are the government. You could no more separate the banks from the government than you could separate stink from shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you believe that, then you are not paying attention. The Big Banks clearly <em>run</em> the financial portion of the government, to the detriment of everyone else. The Big Banks are the government. You could no more separate the banks from the government than you could separate stink from shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Banks &#8211; Big Frauds by jan</title>
		<link>http://rockonomics.net/money/big-banks-big-frauds/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockonomics.net/?p=165#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Just seperate economy from government, the same way there is seperation of church and government.
Banks are not to be blame but government manipulation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just seperate economy from government, the same way there is seperation of church and government.<br />
Banks are not to be blame but government manipulation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on David White&#8217;s &#8220;People of the Lie&#8221; by Guy Fawkes</title>
		<link>http://rockonomics.net/freedom/david-whites-people-of-the-lie/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Fawkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 18:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockonomics.net/?p=170#comment-630</guid>
		<description>Thanks. Broken link fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. Broken link fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on David White&#8217;s &#8220;People of the Lie&#8221; by Jim Nicholson</title>
		<link>http://rockonomics.net/freedom/david-whites-people-of-the-lie/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Nicholson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockonomics.net/?p=170#comment-623</guid>
		<description>Link is broken for me, too many &quot;http&quot;&#039;s in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Link is broken for me, too many &#8220;http&#8221;&#8216;s in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Banks &#8211; Big Frauds by David White&#8217;s &#8220;People of the Lie&#8221; &#124; Rockonomics</title>
		<link>http://rockonomics.net/money/big-banks-big-frauds/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>David White&#8217;s &#8220;People of the Lie&#8221; &#124; Rockonomics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 05:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockonomics.net/?p=165#comment-620</guid>
		<description>[...] WordPress.org       &#171; Big Banks &#8211; Big Frauds [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WordPress.org       &laquo; Big Banks &#8211; Big Frauds [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Banks &#8211; Big Frauds by Kathy</title>
		<link>http://rockonomics.net/money/big-banks-big-frauds/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 19:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockonomics.net/?p=165#comment-619</guid>
		<description>I think I understand what you are saying....BUT:

I have no problem paying back what I agreed and contracted to pay, even if that person/institution is a whore.  However, I refuse to pay more than I agreed to.  

If you have debt, get rid of it as quickly as possible, then pay cash from then on.  Invest your money only in assets YOU have control over, and quit relying on other people to make money for you.  

If you owe money to one of the Too Big to Fail guys, try to transfer your debt to a smaller, local bank.  Yes, the TBTF will get your money, but at least they will no longer be receiving interest on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I understand what you are saying&#8230;.BUT:</p>
<p>I have no problem paying back what I agreed and contracted to pay, even if that person/institution is a whore.  However, I refuse to pay more than I agreed to.  </p>
<p>If you have debt, get rid of it as quickly as possible, then pay cash from then on.  Invest your money only in assets YOU have control over, and quit relying on other people to make money for you.  </p>
<p>If you owe money to one of the Too Big to Fail guys, try to transfer your debt to a smaller, local bank.  Yes, the TBTF will get your money, but at least they will no longer be receiving interest on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

